TAMU’s Texas-Sized
Access Control System
Design Provides
Significant Savings
Texas A&M U’s new access
control system uses
biometrics, gateway
devices, domain software
& other innovations for
campus security
College Station,
Texas—(October 21, 2008)
Retrofitting the world’s
largest contiguous
college campus’s access
control from a
financial-based ID card
system to true
enterprise access
control security was no
easy task for Texas A&M
University (TAMU),
College Station, Texas.
Although the campus has
over 200 academic
buildings sprawled
across many square miles
that includes a
veterinary research
park, farms, and an
airport, the TAMU access
control review committee
specified a centralized
system that also
innovatively enables
decentralized control
where needed. Careful
research helped the
committee choose the
latest technology to
accomplish
state-of-the-art access
control while also
avoiding additional
implementation expenses
through several
innovative cost-saving
measures.
One thing is for sure,
the centralized style
access control system
TAMU arrived at after
several years of
comprehensive
procurement and
implementation is
without peer in the
university world. Other
universities typically
operate an evolving
building-by-building
collection of
incompatible systems
throughout their
campuses which leads to
expensive operation,
renovation, and
expansion costs,
according to Lance Parr,
lead systems
administrator, TAMU
Telecommunications
Department; and Ronnie
Schultz, building access
supervisor, TAMU
Physical Plant
Department—Facilities
Maintenance; both who
helped spearhead the
university’s new access
control system. Unlike
other university access
control systems which
are typically fragmented
among different vendors
that are commissioned
for each new building
phase, TAMU was able to
put its entire system
under one united system.
The
university’s one
centralized system uses
Matrix Systems, Dayton,
Ohio, equipment, but
through domains offered
by Matrix’s Windows®
Frontier™
software package, each
department can implement
a decentralized and
personalized approach.
Thus, academic
departments have the
unique capability to
view and control access
in their own buildings
(or domains) which TAMU
feels is most effective.
Besides the most common
function of residence
hall doors, card readers
at TAMU now operate
everything from parking
lot gates and biological
hazard suites to
computer labs,
classrooms, offices, and
radiation freezers.
“Through the use of
domains, each department
thinks they have their
own software even though
its part of our
centralized system and
we’ve tailored it so
they can only view and
control their own
respective access lists,
doors and schedules,”
said Parr. “This
eliminates the need of
one centralized office
doing nothing but
administrative access
all day. Also we feel
individual departments
know their students more
personally and can grant
or deny access more
judiciously.”
The decentralization
becomes as sophisticated
as required via the
software’s multiple
calendar and access loop
functions. For example a
science building might
have several layers of
access—the building
itself, instructor
offices, general
classrooms, and
laboratories. Science
building administrators
can not only control
access by person, but
also by times throughout
the day or the calendar
year.
The
Matrix system also
allows for many
customized approaches
such as biometrics.
Since access cards can
be lost or stolen,
sensitive locations
depend on biometric hand
scan readers by
Bioscrypt®,
Sunnyvale, Calif., and
Ingersoll Rand,
Montvale, N.J., hand
geometry readers for
access control security.
Many access control
software programs today
are designed for
airports, factories, or
office buildings where
everything is
administrated and
controlled by a
centralized security
group. Conversely, TAMU
sought an access control
program it could
customize into the more
decentralized approach
through domains, which
was important because of
the campus’ huge
geographical size.
Sub-System Gateways
Reduce Building
Controller Equipment
Another significant
cost-saving factor was
TAMU’s request for a
sub-system gateway
device that would use
the campus’ existing
internet protocol (IP)
network to tie together
all buildings while
still reducing the need
for building controllers
in every building.
TAMU’s request resulted
in Matrix developing the
new Matrix System
Gateway (MSG), which
allows card swipe
requests to be processed
by building controllers
in remote locations or
other buildings. “We
couldn’t justify the
expense of building
controller equipment in
several hundred
buildings, especially
since many buildings
might only be using two
to four card readers,”
noted Parr. “We also
wanted the ability
through the MSG and IP
architecture to deploy a
door that might not even
be on our campus. So it
was important to find an
access control system
that could operate from
Ethernet wiring rather
than copper twisted-pair
telephone cable.”
Previously TAMU’s access
control was implemented
through its Diebold
Inc., Canton, Ohio, ICAM
system, which is a
one-card “declining
balance” system designed
for a variety of
financial functions
ranging from student
on-campus debit and
purchasing plus
residence hall.
“Auditors told us
having money functions
and access control on
the same card wasn’t a
good idea,” said Parr.
“We requested bids from
several companies
because we wanted to
upgrade to a
full-featured access
control system, rather
than remain as an add-on
system for a declining
balance system.”
Consequently the
successful financial
part of the Diebold
system remained and was
placed under the
guidance of the school’s
financial department.
TAMU hoped to eventually
implement the
dual-stripe card it uses
today that keep
financial transactions
and access control
separate, but on the
same card.
Saving
Costs With In-House
Installation
The first step was
spinning off access
control’s keyless entry
system responsibilities
to the Physical Plant
Department and its key
shop subsidiary which is
facilitated by Schultz.
During the transition of
separating financial and
access control
responsibilities,
Schultz’s department
began spearheading the
actual wiring and
installation of keyless
entry systems, which
Diebold had previously
performed. Doing the
keyless entry system’s
installations in-house
allowed TAMU to utilize
their own personnel and
also created a
dependable single source
responsibility that fell
under Schultz’s control.
Any emergency
maintenance on keyless
entry systems could be
handled immediately by
trained in-house
Physical Plant
Department maintenance
people.
Developing an in-house
installation team proved
beneficial after
choosing the new access
control system. Although
Matrix Systems has its
own in-house
installation department,
TAMU requested that
Matrix train its key
shop team to install the
new access control
system itself to avoid
additional costs,
according to Parr. “Once
we were trained for
installation on one or
two of them, it was
quite easy to handle the
entire roll-out,” said
Schultz.
Six major leading access
control manufacturers
were reviewed for
industry longevity,
track records, user
interfaces, internal
architecture, product
quality, customization,
customer support, and
compatibility with
existing equipment. An
access control review
committee was
established with
representatives from
residence life, student
housing, the ROTC, the
Physical Plant’s key
shop,
telecommunications, and
Computing and
Information Services
Department (CIF).
“During the bid
evaluation process we
received a lot of good
feedback from Matrix
customers such as Kodak,
U.S. Steel, and the
healthcare field that
had huge systems similar
to what we were
planning,” said Parr.
The fact the school
wanted to retain its
investment in 220 Matrix
Systems model MS-570
card readers that
Diebold had used as an
OEM product helped put
Matrix in the forefront.
Retaining the existing
card readers saved TAMU
several thousand dollars
in materials and labor
versus a new access
control system.
Seamless
Conversion Between Old &
New Systems
Saving money was
important, however the
University wanted a
vendor that could
customize to TAMU’s
specifications. For
example, one of the
largest challenges was
implementing a seamless
database inversion
between the outgoing and
incoming systems on a
reader-by-reader basis
with little downtime,
according to Parr. By
carefully inspecting
vendor capabilities and
compatibilities
beforehand, the database
inversion saved
thousands of man-hours
by converting
electronically versus
manual data re-entry.
Specifically, Matrix
devised custom
interfaces that allowed
the University’s team to
export data such as
access lists from the
existing VMS-based
format to the relational
database Matrix’s
Frontier software
utilizes.
Keeping the ID
production in TAMU’s
finance department where
physical equipment and
trained personnel
already existed saved
significant costs in
relocating, training and
new ID equipment
purchases. Making this
choice possible however
required Matrix to
customize an interface
that allows information
to be generated in the
original Diebold CS Gold
system and immediately
transferred to the
Frontier access control
software for
instantaneous use. “When
fall semester freshmen
first get their ID cards
on the CS Gold system,
they can literally walk
to their respective
residence hall and swipe
their new card through a
Matrix card reader to
gain access,” said Parr.
Going
More High Tech in the
Future
As the new access
control system evolves,
TAMU is adding new
features such as an
elevator reader
distribution panel (RDP),
which interfaces
elevator controls with
the access control
system. Three elevator
RDPs are now in place
and Parr estimates
another six will soon be
online. The elevator
RDPs allows card swiping
and then opens only on
the user’s authorized
floors.
In light of the Virginia
Tech University tragedy
in 2007, many
universities are now
looking for better lock
down procedures and
communications during
disasters. While TAMU
residence halls have
been locked down for
over 30 years, the
University is hoping to
take precautions further
than other institutions.
In addition to tying
together all campus
email, television, radio
and other
communications, he has
also requested Matrix to
interface with these
alerts by providing text
message readouts on
building card readers.
Today,
TAMU’s access control
system is running at
full function and the
sophistication the
University envisioned
when they specified the
system. Since the system
is completely scalable,
future expandability
possibilities are almost
infinite. Future
additions to the system
will prove to be
cost-cutting as well
because TAMU plans to
utilize new developments
such as Power over
Ethernet (PoE), which is
an emerging security
system technology that
transmits electrical
power and data to remote
devices over an existing
standard Ethernet
network’s twisted-pair
CAT5 cables.
This
potentially eliminates
up to 33 percent in
installation/labor costs
associated with running
individual AC power
supplies to new entryway
access control hardware.
TAMU is also
experimenting with
Omnilock wireless door
locks from OSI, Chula
Vista, Calif., which
promises additional
labor savings on new
entry systems.
PoE is
just one of many
innovations TAMU has
either used or plans to
implement in the future
to cut costs. While
cutting edge systems are
possible today, the
TAMU’s review
committee’s quest for
reducing costs in the
equipment procurement
process makes it totally
unique. Seamless
conversion innovations
between systems,
in-house installation,
and reusing existing
equipment helped TAMU
avoid additional costs
but in no way sacrificed
the integrity of the
system.